Most accounts are training the algorithm to find the wrong person
The platforms will find whoever you tell them to find. Almost nobody treats that as the actual job, and it is the most expensive mistake I find in an ad account.
Read thisNo strategy underneath it, no tracking that proves anything, and an owner left defining their own metrics to keep the agency honest. I write about the difference between spending money on marketing and having a plan.

The platforms will find whoever you tell them to find. Almost nobody treats that as the actual job, and it is the most expensive mistake I find in an ad account.
Read thisA week of results read $203,000 on Tuesday and $355,000 on Friday. Nothing changed. Here is what was happening, and the reporting rule I adopted because of it.
See everything10 years
In performance and growth marketing. Learned by doing and by reading. Still at both.
$15M+
In lead generation ad spend. Google, Meta, LinkedIn, Local Services, and OpenAI Ads.
114
Companies. Home services to banking to furniture retail to national franchise systems.
What that produced, and how it was counted
6.1x ROAS
Return on $1.38M in Google Ads spend over one year. Jobs counted in the CRM, not the ad platform.
$750K+
Top-line revenue from an outreach system. Cost $40,000 to run.
A broken conversion is worse than no conversion at all. No data makes you cautious. Wrong data makes you certain, and then it tells you to spend more. I have found a single misconfigured event inflating reported results six times over while the owner was reading it as a good month.
The platforms will find whoever you tell them to find. That is the whole job now, and almost nobody treats it as the job. If your optimization event fires on a page view, you are paying to acquire people who look at things.
Cost per lead on one campaign tells you whether that campaign is healthy. It cannot tell you whether to spend more. That decision needs blended numbers: what a customer costs across every channel at once, what one is worth over the whole relationship, and what the next dollar returns rather than what the average dollar already returned. Most accounts are run entirely at the campaign level, and then scaling breaks them.
Good marketing produces good return. The trouble starts when return is the only instrument on the dashboard, because then every decision bends toward the next thirty days. You lose the ability to run the play where you break even for a year to reach a customer worth far more over the next five. The campaign gets more efficient and the brand gets no bigger.
When nobody hands you a strategy, you reach for the one number you can see and use it to police the relationship. That number quietly becomes the strategy. I have watched owners measure return so aggressively that the only campaigns surviving the filter were the ones already guaranteed to work, which means the agency never has to attempt anything difficult and the business never reaches anyone new.
This is the failure most marketers never see, because they are gone before it lands. Leads double, the team cannot answer the phone, response times slip, reviews get worse, and the business ends up in worse shape than before the campaign worked. A growth plan has to stay ahead of capacity rather than outrun it. I ask about hiring and scheduling before I ask about budget.
Before an engagement starts I calculate the best possible outcome. Not the likely one. The maximum, assuming everything goes right. If that ceiling sits below what the business actually needs, I say so before anyone pays me. A project with a ceiling of five leads a month, sold to someone expecting thirty, has already failed on day one no matter how good the work turns out to be.
Short-term wins are easy to fake. Long-term growth is not.
Chris Wendel
What a customer costs to acquire, and whether the number you are looking at is real. Bidding, budget, creative, attribution, and the specific ways a healthy account goes bad without anyone noticing.
The system underneath the campaigns. Offers, funnels, retention, and the difference between a channel that works this month and a machine that compounds. Mostly this is about what to build next, and what to leave alone.
Pricing, margin, capacity, and what growth actually costs to deliver. The part of a plan that decides whether more customers makes a business better or just busier. I write about that honestly, including the parts that went badly.
Every claim comes from work I have done. Every number is real. When I am guessing, I say so.
Unbound Collective is a seven-person marketing agency in Little Rock, Arkansas, where I live with my wife Lauren and our three kids. Most of my working hours are still in the ad accounts.
I started it in 2017 after a small business asked me to build their website. That turned into advertising, then strategy, then a company. Most days I am still writing the tracking code and running the strategy sessions. Doing both is the reason I never have to guess whether something worked, and the reason I can build a plan that is worth measuring in the first place.
There is no formal training behind any of it. Everything came from books, from YouTube, and from spending a lot of other people’s money and watching carefully what happened. I am still learning that way.
What matters to me is being right rather than sounding right. I would rather tell someone the ceiling is lower than they hoped before they pay me than explain it afterward. That has cost me work, and I will keep doing it.
This site is where I write it all down: the things that are working, the things that are not, and the things I am still trying to figure out. Some of it will look like a brag. Some of it will not. That is an accurate picture of where things actually are.
Four questions worth answering before you spend another dollar.
If you cannot answer those, that is not your failure. Somebody was paid to answer them. I write about working through them, two or three times a month.
No pitch. Unsubscribe whenever you want.
Or reach me directly at chris@chrisjwendel.com